Archive for the 'SEO' Category

New Cause for ALT Tags

Posted by Scott Randolph on October 12th, 2007

If you’ve been keeping your eye on the online world, you may have heard about a pending lawsuit against retail giant Target. This suit is being brought about because Target failed to provide ALT tags on its website - which the plantiff states constitutes discrimination against visually impaired users.

Has Target missed the mark legally? I won’t comment on that, but what I CAN comment on is that Target’s web developers have missed the mark on a basic (and very easy to execute) best practice. From the W3C Website:

The alt attribute is defined in a set of tags (namely, img, area and optionally for input and applet) to allow you to provide a text equivalent for the object.A text equivalent brings the following benefits to your web site and its visitors in the following common situations:

  • nowadays, Web browsers are available in a very wide variety of platforms with very different capacities; some cannot display images at all or only a restricted set of type of images; some can be configured to not load images. If your code has the alt attribute set in its images, most of these browsers will display the description you gave instead of the images
  • some of your visitors cannot see images, be they blind, color-blind, low-sighted; the alt attribute is of great help for those people that can rely on it to have a good idea of what’s on your page
  • search engine bots belong to the two above categories: if you want your website to be indexed as well as it deserves, use the alt attribute to make sure that they won’t miss important sections of your pages.

Besides allowing for accessibility and standards compliance, ALT tags also offer some benefit from an SEO perspective, providing context for spiders as to what your images represent. The exact SEO value of this is up for debate, and we ARE NOT suggesting stuffing every ALT tag with keywords - however, since it can’t hurt, will likely help, and opens up your site to visually impaired visitors, and is very easy to execute - you have no excuse not to do it!

If your site isn’t standards compliant, and you need some help getting there, feel free to contact us and we’ll help you out!

How to Get Authoritative Links

Posted by Scott Randolph on February 23rd, 2007

It’s the Holy Grail of SEO’s.  They are also great channels to drive relevant traffic to your site outside of search.  What are they?  Authoritative Links!

The “Authority” of a site is calculated by the value of the sites linking in to it, as well as the quality of the content on those sites.  Many “A-List” blogs can carry amazing link value, along with huge readerships (so they drive traffic directly to your site as well).  How do you get a link from a top blog?  Content.

Writing great, relevant content is the best method to get links, get search rankings, and create and keep a dedicated readership.  It also helps to know how to network with bloggers, and how to create relationships with them.

Other top sources for great links are .edu and .gov sites.  These links can be hard to come by, but are worth the effort.  The SearchEngineWatch Blog has a great post on how to get authoritative links:

  1. Focus on links from authoritative sites that are relevant.
  2. Be prepared for the fact that success in a campaign to get a link from an authoritative site might take many months.
  3. Be prepared for your strategies to fail more often than they succeed. If you do a really good job, perhaps 1 in 4 of your campaigns will work.
  4. Be prepared to invest in building a relationship. Your first communications with the authoritative site may not include a request for a link.
  5. It’s a campaign. You need a strategy, and it may have multiple steps. Be prepared to invest in the strategy to make it work
  6. Know that they won’t link to you because they want to help you make money
  7. Know that they will link to your site because your content is valuable to their users (and because they actually care about their users).
  8. Meet their needs.
  9. Study their needs. Figure out what they need, and then figure out which of their needs you can meet. One way to do this is to review things written in the past by key contacts at the site. They may have expressed a need, such as “I wish I knew how to …”, “The web needs a resource that …”, etc.
  10. Be opportunistic. Your target site may identify a need that you can address. Jump on it as quickly as you can, and then fill the need completely.
  11. Invest more in your first 2 or 3 killer links than you will in the ones that follow it. Your first authoritative link will simplify obtaining the ones that will come later, as that endorsement makes all the difference in the world.

Thanks to Eric for providing that guide!

Technorati Tags: , ,

Beginning SEO (a to-do list)

Posted by Scott Randolph on February 21st, 2007

SEOmoz has a great list of 24 Checkups for Clueless Developers/Marketers. As it turns out, this is essentially a how-to guide to get started in the SEO process for your business site.

Each of these points are very pertinent - and I wanted to list my favorites, and add a little extra to each of those:

5. Double check your code to make sure you’ve got your content titles and subtitles under H1 / H2 tags.

This is one tactic you don’t see nearly enough of. As a general rule, I like to use H1/H2 tags wherever possible. It really helps in telling the search engines what the gist of the content below it is, and also organizes the content for your users. Hot Tip - Make your first H1 Tag match up with your Title tag if possible.

7. Make sure contextual links are widely spread and commonly used all across the website content to emphasize key pages.

Despite the fact you already have great site-wide navigation (making it easy for your users to get around), breadcrumbs (making it even easier) - you cannot forget to link to key pages on your site from within the content itself! This give you the opportunity to use specific anchor text (and different versions of anchor text) within your site. This will also help in the overall crawlability of the site.

13. Ensure that your 404 page contains links to your main categories and maybe a search box.

Whenever I suggest setting up a default 404 page with content on it, instead of the usual error message, clients never fail to smack their foreheads with a big “Why didn’t I think of that?” It’s easy to do, so there’s really no excuse. It can help users who go astray, as well as help alleviate the pain of broken links in the SERPS and from inbound links. If nothing else, default the error page to your sitemap.

You do have a sitemap, right?

Technorati Tags: , , ,

That’s a Good Question

I just left a consultation meeting with a client where I raised the question “where are your site visits originating from today?” The first response was “That’s a good question. We don’t really know.” After some thought he remembered that they acquired a competitor’s domain that was already organically ranked and forwarded it to their site. This now accounts for a vast amount of their daily visits.

Impressive

I have experienced cases where one site was forwarded to another to take advantage of its organic ranking. We have even done it ourselves in the case of a second domain we owned. We were taking this second site down, it was ranked, so why waste it? I was fairly impressed that these novices identified this opportunity and did what it took to milk the reward.

Temporary?

The question now is how long will they be able to take advantage of this free fruit. In this case both the acquired domain and the actual domain have similar content so it may retain the rankings for some time. My recommendation to anyone in a situation similar to this is not to bet your business on it. Start now doing what it takes to get the actual site ranked well organically or you may be caught by surprise.

Search Engine Ranking Factors

Posted by Janice Thompson on January 30th, 2007

I just came out of a meeting where a client wanted to know how soon his site would show up on the search engines since he had now implemented some meta tags. It’s one of those situations that makes you want to laugh and cry at the same time.

Needless to say there are a lot of things that determine whether or not you’re in the number 1 slot on the first page of Google for a specific term or not visible at all. For those of us who are in this business of search engine optimization and search marketing, this is a topic of continued study and debate. For one thing, the engines themselves frequently change what factors they look at when determining where to place sites in the natural search listings. And to complicate things even more, each engine has a slightly different formula for search engine ranking factors. Right now, we’re all waiting with baited breath to see how things shake out on Yahoo! post Panama.

If you want a thorough, although a little bit dated, perspective on what’s important to the major search engines, check out Rand Fishkin’s article. It contains a large list of factors that can influence a site’s ranking on the engines as well as votes on the relative importance of each factor by some SEO gurus.

SEO Whitepaper

Posted by Scott Randolph on January 30th, 2007

Here is a link to our whitepaper: SEO - What it is, What it isn’t, and Why you should care.

It covers the basics of SEO - a list of things you should know if you’re doing it yourself, or engaging an agency to help you.

Diversifying Your Traffic Portfolio

Posted by Scott Randolph on January 26th, 2007

Would you put your entire retirement into one stock? Of course not - it’s crazy, right?!? You would consult an expert, or do a lot of pain-staking research yourself, and carefully craft a plan to optimize your returns on the money you saved, while insuring that if one company you’ve invested in fails, you won’t end up in the poor house.

If the above scenario makes perfect sense, why is it that so many very intelligent business owners are only concerned about one stream of traffic? That’s right folks - the big “G” (Google, for those of you who were wondering) is a great source of traffic and revenue. However, if you have positioned yourself to be solely reliant upon Google traffic to be successful - you’re poised on the brink of disaster.

Fortunately - it’s not too late. If you’re still planning out your Internet strategy for 2007, make diversifying your traffic portfolio one of your top priorities. If you’ve already got your ‘07 strategy done, change it to include this.

What exactly does diversifying your traffic portfolio mean?
It’s just a fancy way of saying that you’re trying to find as many good sources of relevant traffic as possible. As a general rule, I shoot for no more than 30% of traffic coming from one particular source. That way, if one gets shut off, I still have at least 70% of traffic and sales coming in, while I figure out what to do about the other 30%.

Ok, so we know we need to do it, but how do we make it happen?
This may be easier than you think. First off, you want to make a plan - bring together your strategies for online advertising, PPC, SEO, email, PR, and traditional marketing, and look for ways they can work together to help drive traffic. Here are 5 example scenarios to get you started:

1)Our SEO is suggesting link building. Maybe we should INSIST that all the link building he does come from relevant sites that we think could provide us with a reasonable traffic stream.

2)We’re running a pretty extensive PPC campaign, so maybe we should look into adding a way for visitors to sign up for our newsletter if they don’t buy immediately. That way, we can bring them back.

3)Our communications depart sends out 3 press releases a month - we should send those out online as well, and maybe create a blog on our site to talk about them.

Those are just a few ideas to get you started. If your business is over-reliant on one traffic stream and you’d like to talk - just let us know.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

To Measure or Not to Measure

Posted by Steve Thompson on January 24th, 2007

The Center for Media Research reported Monday that 81% of survey respondents plan to increase 2007 spending on email marketing while 70% of respondents said they apply basic or no analysis to these campaigns.

As an Online Marketer I sometimes grumble at how offline media is not held up to the same standards as online for measurebility. I have even had a client, one of the top five US companies in telecommunications no less, say we shouldn’t hold traditional media up to the same standards as online. This was said while we were sitting down going over the details of their online campaign which reported how every dollar spent related to each conversion we achieved. The results of the online campaign weren’t bad but there was always this offline media superiority aura hovering over our heads. Since there was no way to measure the offline results it must be performing better than online.

Based upon experiences like this you would think I would be relieved to see survey responses like this. Wrong! We must go forward using the tools that are available no matter how uncomfortable they may sometimes make us. This should be done even at the cost of a decision to terminate a non performing online campaign and continuing a offline campaign where we just don’t know.

Welcome to our new home!

Posted by Scott Randolph on January 16th, 2007

This site is the new home for www.siteedgeagency.com. Welcome, and check back for industry news and helpful tips.