Archive for the 'Search Landscape' Category

Get a Full Time Online Marketing Employee for Half the Cost

Posted by Steve Thompson on November 10th, 2009

Acquire an FTE (Full Time Employee)

The question isn’t IF a good online marketing employee will help increase revenue.  If they are good they will.  But there is a question as to if the cost of this person will exceed the revenue they bring in.  For example:  $100,000/year salary and benefits for a good online marketer is a good deal.  If this employee helps you bring in an incremental $200,000/year in revenue this is a no brainer.  If the market will only let them bring you in $50,000/year there is probably a problem.

Acquire PTE (Part Time Employee)

A part time employee may also be considered and may cut the salary requirement in half.  You may also reduce the quality of the person you are seeking.  You are probably seeking (or at least hoping for) Organic Search, Paid Search, Display, E-mail, and Social Media marketing skills in one person.  Your chances of finding all these skills in one person are slim in the first place.  This effort is further hampered when you only have a part time position to offer.  Two reason for this: 1) you screen out the best people and 2) you limit the time they have to devote to doing a complete job each month.

Hire an Agency

Acquiring a GOOD agency will address the problem of expertise.  They will most likely have expertise in Organic, Paid, Display, E-mail, and Social Media.  Unlike your perfect employee they will most likely be multiple individuals who focus on their core competencies.   The problem with this scenario is you will probably go from $100,000/year salary and benefits for a full time employee to $200,000/year to engage a good agency.  You may also find you will not have an employer/employee type relationship.  As hard as they may try not to do so they will probably come across as a bunch of arrogant know-it-alls that will insist on doing everything their way with little input from you.  This may be justified in some cases but will be unacceptable in many situations.

Hire a Virtual Agency

This is the best of both worlds and more.  You have a)  at your disposal expertise in Organic, Paid, Display, E-mail, and Social Media, b) part time “virtual” employees while maintaining the quality and coverage of a Full Time Employee, and c) a cost that is closer to the cost of the part time employee.  The expertise gained by engaging  this virtual agency is further enhanced with years of contacts, available online marketing tools and techniques at their disposal, and economies of scales that simply can’t be enjoyed by companies that don’t have online marketing as their primary business.

What You Should Expect From A Virtual Agency

  1. A written online marketing strategy that is agreed upon and understood by all parties.
  2. Specific online marketing goals agreed upon by you and the virtual agency.
  3. A specific time schedule with benchmarks for reaching these goals.
  4. A specific/permanent team assigned to your company (this may be two or three individuals but should address the expertise required by the strategy).
  5. Mutual agreed upon status meetings with the virtual team to gauge the campaign effectiveness and to gain your industry expertise.

Virtual Agencies are usually smaller than the traditional online agency and will restrict the number of clients that they service at one time. They purposely remain small to maintain control and that personal relationship with the owners.  They limit the client load to ensure that the quality remains in each relationship.

Contact Steve Thompson at 816-587-8880 or e-mail him at steve.thompson@siteedgeagency.com if you would like additional information on the Virtual Agency program offered by siteEDGE Agency.

Technorati Tags: Online Marketing, Online Agency, Marketing, Paid Search, Search Engine Optimization

 

The 1, 2, 3 Punch of the Google Quality Score Change

Posted by Steve Thompson on August 28th, 2008

Google is making changes to the way it calculates and implements its Quality Score rules.

Currently a keyword’s Quality Score is determined by a number of factors, including the term’s click-through rate (CTR), relevance and historical performance, among others. AdWords Quality Scores influence the amount an advertiser has to pay to run the ad, as well as the position the ad will appear in.

The before and after of the Quality Score changes are:

  • Previously, advertisers would see a rating of “poor,” “OK,” or “great.” However in the coming weeks, that will shift to a 10-point system, with one signaling an ad of the poorest quality, and 10 the highest quality. 

“Before, you didn’t have much visibility into the score itself. You couldn’t tell whether you were at the top or bottom end of the ‘OK’ or ‘great’ scale, and you couldn’t really see how any changes you made would affect it. With this granular scale, you can make a change and move from 6 to 7, for example, and see that your efforts were successful. You can also better assess the greatest areas for improvement.”  1

  • The second change is that the Quality Score will be assessed on a per-query basis, as opposed to being tied to the keyword indefinitely. 

“This way, AdWords will use the most accurate, specific, and up-to-date performance information when determining whether an ad should be displayed. Your ads will be more likely to show when they’re relevant and less likely to show when they’re not.  In addition, ads that were previously marked “inactive for search” because they didn’t meet the blanket Quality Score requirements may actually be placed in rotation for relevant queries.”  1

  • Lastly, keywords will no longer be tied to a minimum bid. Instead, advertisers will see the minimum amount they would need to have their ad appear on the first page of results.

“According to the Inside AdWords blog, this change was tied directly to advertiser feedback.” “We learned that knowing your minimum bid wasn’t always helpful in getting the ad placement you wanted,” the company stated on the blog. “So we hope that first page bids will give you better guidance on how to achieve your advertising goals.” 1

We will be watching the effect of these changes on the campaigns we have under management.  The 10 point system may first appear to be helpful but we still don’t have enough specific information to know how to move from say a 7 to an 8 or 9.

The move to a per-query basis may be good; or may not.  Currently if you achieved a “Great” you would be there for a while.  It will be difficult to judge a moving target if the algorithm changes the ranking too often.  There is nothing to lead me to believe this will happen but we will be watching.

The minimum bid tied to first page results has me the most concerned.  How will the amateur search marketers respond to this?  If everyone starts fighting for the first page we will greatly increase the likelihood of bidding wars where everyone loses.

All we can do at this point is wait and see.  Once we have the proper intel we will adjust accordingly.

1  Tameka Kee, Media Post Online Media Daily