After three years of working with large and small franchise units I’ve conclude there is a simple formula for successful online marketing for franchisees.  The formula may be simple but its implementation is somewhat involved.  Read on:

1. Tailor Your Campaigns to Each Franchisee.  To properly implement an online marketing campaign for your franchisees you need a) a landing page for each product or service, b) hundreds, perhaps thousands of properly researched search terms, and c) dozens of ads that are designed to tie these terms to a specific landing page. This needs to be done for each franchisee fifty, one hundred, or a thousand times.   I’ve often seen a 50% improvement in performance just by tailoring a campaign.
2. Show the Ads Only in Areas that the Franchisee Can Serve.  Franchisees often lose money on online advertising.  The main culprit– paying to show an ad outside of the service area.  Considerable time and money can be lost when a franchisee is forced to interface with prospects they have little to no chance of converting to customers.  All this increases the Franchisee’s Customer Acquisition Costs which may lead to an erroneous conclusion that online marketing does not work.
3. Route the Prospect to the Web Page of Franchisee in their Area. Just as the campaign needs to be specific to the franchisee—the page the prospect is sent to must be specific to the franchisee.  When a prospect arrives at your site from the organic or “free” listings, it’s okay to send them to your home page that contains your “Store Locator” tool.  Prospects who click on paid search ads tend to be more impatient.  Here’s where using a combination of the search engine’s local targeting options and a localized landing page can really lift conversions.
4. Manage each Individual Franchisee’s Campaign.  In addition to setting up franchisee level campaigns, changes to bids, ad copy, landing pages, offers and keywords should occur at the local level.  Why?  Here’s where online is no different than offline.  Offers, prices, products, services etc that sell really well in New York City may not resonate with consumers in Boise.  In addition the competition for customers may vary greatly from one market to the next.  This is hard work, but if you really want to see stellar campaign results, it’s a must do.
5. Separate Out Selling Franchises From Securing Business for the Franchisee.  Franchisors want to sell more franchisees, which is a good thing.  Franchisees want more customers, which is also a good thing.  Although both are good, they are very different.  A direct response campaign should have a singular focus.  Promoting too many things at once only distracts and confuses the prospective customer.  If the keyword that brought the prospect to your site is “Math Help,” the page they land on should be all about proving how you’re the best option for helping them with math and nothing else.  I’ve even seen a case where a franchise was driving all search traffic to the main page of the site, which in addition to selling franchises, also encouraged visitors to enter complaints about a franchisee!  Remember, your competition is only one click of the Back Button away.

Nothing that I’ve stated above is rocket science.  But if you have more than a handful of franchisees in your system, it can be a daunting task.  Your choice is to either staff up or hire a qualified agency to run your campaigns.  In either case, if you follow these rules your franchisees will get more customers from the Internet.   

Steve Thompson is co-founder and Managing Director at siteEDGE agency.  Steve has extensive experience in structuring; managing and optimizing online marketing campaigns for small and large (+500 units) franchise systems as well as large companies with a regional or local focus.  To contact Steve, email him at Steve dot Thompson at siteEDGE agency dot com. 

Spread the Word:  del.icio.us Digg Reddit

Google (Accidently) Leaks Quality Score Variables.

Posted by Steve Thompson on April 29th, 2008

I have blogged on Google’s Quality Score before.  It was the usual insight about why its important to get a good quality score.  I went into how getting a bad quality score may cause you to pay more to be in position number 4 than your competition paid to be in position number 2.  I even talked about some things to do that may help to improve a quality score.  I’m sure the insiders at Google had a good laugh because no matter how much I hypothesized, I had no varifiable evidence on what will increase a quality score.

Earlier today Google may have had a gitch that made public some of the variables used to make up the quality score.  This is the buzz anyway.  Eric Landers of Search Engine Journal published in his blog that immediately below each of the sponsored search results (AdWords) were three separate variable names and values.  Eric has screen shots and an opinion on what these may mean.  Since this gitch has since been corrected by Google I wasn’t fortunate enough to have seen this myself to allow me to share my insight.  I will at least point you to Eric’s Blog on this so you can get it directly from him.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Spread the Word:  del.icio.us Digg Reddit

How to Save Money with Google’s Content Network

Posted by Steve Thompson on April 29th, 2008

Google Content Network Defined

The Google content network comprises millions of websites, news pages, and blogs that partner with Google to display targeted AdWords ads.  Ads to the content network are targeted based on content themes rather than specific keywords as is done on the search network. Unlike a keyword search which is well defined, a content match may not display your ad on the site you had in mind resulting in clicks you prefer not to have.

Identifying the Sites that Don’t Convert

On June 1st last year, Google made available a report that tells you which sites are not converting.  You can run this report at the ad group or the campaign level for a domain or a url.  Once you run the report you can feed the results into the Site Exclusion option in the Tools section.  This will cause the domains or url-s you designate to not show your ad resulting in a better use of your ad dollars.

Further Analysis

This on the surface appeared to be an excellent opportunity for one of our clients to save a few dollars.  After running the report for all the ad groups we learned there was about $1,075 that could have been saved in June if the sites with no conversions had been excluded.  Upon further analysis we determined that some sites did not convert for some ad groups but did convert for others.  Since the Site Exclusion option does not allow exclusions at the ad group level we had to revise our plan to exclude the non performing sites at the campaign level.

Still Not Bad

The initial excitement over the potention savings abated somewhat.  Instead of the $1,075 a month savings that we had anticipated from excluding non performing content network sites, we will save about $521 a month. We have to factor in that this is just one month’s worth of data but it is still encouraging when you consider a year’s savings would equal $6,252.  Is it worth a try or is there still more analysis we should do?

One Additional Thought

The thought that one month’s worth a data is not enough to make a decision stayed on my mind. On one hand we may be paying more than we have to each day.  On the other hand we may be making decisions on incomplete data.  Thinking it through it seems logical to conclude that if a domain or url doesn’t convert then don’t spend money on it.  The only down side would be if it converts later we would miss a conversion.  But what impact would 1 or 2 conversions have when we are talking about 100 conversions a day.

An Aha Moment

Then it occured to me.  Most of the conversions orginate from a few domains or URLs, but the bulk of the conversions come from many domains or URLs.  It is the old numbers game.  In the reports there were thousands of domains and URL-s that had only 1 or 2 conversions for June.  The number of sites that had just 1 or 2 conversions were not the same domains and URL-s that had only 1 or 2 conversions in July. If I had excluded the non converting domains and URL-s that had no conversions in June we would have eliminated 100-s of conversions in July.

My Conclusion

Based upon this data I concluded that sites should not be excluded simply because they don’t have conversions.  Another criterion should be placed on top of this that is simular to the cost per acquisition (CPA) measurement.  With the CPA you assign a dollar amount to what a conversion is worth.  If it is worth $40 is get a new customer,  $40 worth of clicks to get it is acceptable. Simularly if the non converting sites are costing you a few pennies a month to keep them then it may be wise to do so.  If they are beyond a thresshold you determine to be unacceptable, then by all means exclude them.  As with a CPA, some conversions are not worth the price.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Spread the Word:  del.icio.us Digg Reddit

Web Analytics Is A Fire Extinguisher

Posted by Steve Thompson on January 18th, 2008

I didn’t come up with this title and analogy but I wish I had.  See Jim Sterne’s article of the same name posted January 18th, 2008.  In a “net shell” (pun attempted) it says, even with all your other business priorities if you don’t have good web analytics in place your Web site is burning money.  I have said this to many clients over the years but never this well. Take a few minutes and read what Jim has to say about this topic

Spread the Word:  del.icio.us Digg Reddit

5 rules for quality landing page design

Posted by Steve Thompson on December 18th, 2007

There is danger in limiting landing page design and implementation to just five rules but I like Billy Blog’s presentation.  According to Billy you should:

Keep it focused: Force your page to have only one goal. If you are required to have two, then choose one as a priority and emphasize that one. Remove excess baggage like advertisements and navigation bars so that visitors have only two choices: convert or leave.

Give a good second impression: People don’t see the landing page first, they see your PPC or banner ad, e-mail or even search result. Build relevancy between them. Use the same messaging from the first point of contact to your landing page. I try to use the same words or exact title from advertisement to landing page. Keep creative consistent too. One thing that is often overlooked are offers, if you put an offer on your page, put it on your ad and vice versa.

Target your biggest (middle) audience: There’s 3 types of visitors. Ones that’ll convert no matter what, ones that might convert and ones that are just looking. You only need to grab that middle audience. A landing page is not meant to please everyone, it is meant to drive conversions, meaning pleasing only those that will convert! For example, putting less information on a page will drive away people who only looking to learn more, but help push along those that are looking to buy.

Stop talking about yourself: Customers come to your page to read about the product, not your entire company history. Talk about yourself to the extent that it will calm visitor’s fears about your legitimacy and quality, else you’ll clutter the page and intimidate the visitor with blobs of text. Third party validation logos (BBB, Hacker Safe) and quotes from happy customers are often enough.

Use a product shot: So a cheetah might be a great symbolic way to show how fast the computers you’re selling are, but really you should be showing your computer. Customers come in and will only spend a few seconds to see if they’re in the right place before hitting back and so you need to communicate what you’re selling fast. Why distract them with symbolic images, when your product is what you want them to buy? If you’re service oriented, then people probably are a good idea, but make sure they directly represent what you’re doing.

For more from Billy go to Billy’s Blog.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Spread the Word:  del.icio.us Digg Reddit

Janice Thompson featured on Advertising Crossing

Posted by Scott Randolph on October 25th, 2007

Recently, our managing director and fearless co-leader, Janice Thompson, was featured in an Advertising Crossing article.

Here are a few prime snippets from her interview, head on over there to read the whole thing.

The company has worked with a wide range of talent, focusing its campaigns on “delivering more direct sales or leads for [its] clients,” says Thompson, which include large nonprofit clients and Fortune 500 companies as well as middle-market businesses.

“We’re snobs when it comes to running campaigns that can be measured in terms of bottom-line results,” Thompson says.

Which is why campaigns that help decrease client costs — “campaigns where we’ve been able to decrease a client’s advertising costs by 33% while increasing the results by 34%” — are Thompson’s pride and joy.

“I guess it goes back to my financial background,” Thompson adds. “I know we’re delivering real value for the client.”

Great interview Janice!

Spread the Word:  del.icio.us Digg Reddit

New Cause for ALT Tags

Posted by Scott Randolph on October 12th, 2007

If you’ve been keeping your eye on the online world, you may have heard about a pending lawsuit against retail giant Target. This suit is being brought about because Target failed to provide ALT tags on its website - which the plantiff states constitutes discrimination against visually impaired users.

Has Target missed the mark legally? I won’t comment on that, but what I CAN comment on is that Target’s web developers have missed the mark on a basic (and very easy to execute) best practice. From the W3C Website:

The alt attribute is defined in a set of tags (namely, img, area and optionally for input and applet) to allow you to provide a text equivalent for the object.A text equivalent brings the following benefits to your web site and its visitors in the following common situations:

  • nowadays, Web browsers are available in a very wide variety of platforms with very different capacities; some cannot display images at all or only a restricted set of type of images; some can be configured to not load images. If your code has the alt attribute set in its images, most of these browsers will display the description you gave instead of the images
  • some of your visitors cannot see images, be they blind, color-blind, low-sighted; the alt attribute is of great help for those people that can rely on it to have a good idea of what’s on your page
  • search engine bots belong to the two above categories: if you want your website to be indexed as well as it deserves, use the alt attribute to make sure that they won’t miss important sections of your pages.

Besides allowing for accessibility and standards compliance, ALT tags also offer some benefit from an SEO perspective, providing context for spiders as to what your images represent. The exact SEO value of this is up for debate, and we ARE NOT suggesting stuffing every ALT tag with keywords - however, since it can’t hurt, will likely help, and opens up your site to visually impaired visitors, and is very easy to execute - you have no excuse not to do it!

If your site isn’t standards compliant, and you need some help getting there, feel free to contact us and we’ll help you out!

Spread the Word:  del.icio.us Digg Reddit

Military Marketing Tips

Posted by Janice Thompson on October 4th, 2007

I was interviewed recently by Larry Dobrow for a story that appears in this month’s OMMA  (requires free subscription) about marketing to the military.  As the article points out, active duty and reservists, military families and veterans have been grossly overlooked and misunderstood when it comes to marketing budgets and messages.  So as we enter the holiday season, I thought I’d provide some specific tips for marketers who are looking for niche opportunities that can yield high ROI:

  1. Know your audience–the military today is not the military of 20 years ago.  The US Armed Forces is 20% female, very internet savvy (for many the internet is the preferred means of communication), and are tightly networked.  Make sure your military marketing strategy includes a heavy-duty online component that reaches deeply into the social media networks and promotes word-of-mouth advertising.
  2. Don’t over-patronize.  You don’t have to use a waving flag in every creative. 
  3. Don’t make uniform mistakes.  If you choose to show someone in uniform, make sure the model is 100% authentic.  If your brand is positioned with someone in fake fatigues, it shows that you don’t really care.
  4. Use discounts and special offers to say “Thank You for Your Service” rather than to promote savings.  Military households tend to have above average disposable incomes.
  5. Customize your messages, creatives and media buys to reach the sub-groups within the military market (e.g. gamers, golfers, spouses, families, Hispanics, Asians, African Americans).  We have found in working with clients that are marketing to the military, it is more beneficial to create your own custom network than to rely solely upon traditional media buys.  The more microscopic and targeted your message, the better.

So this holiday season while all your competitors are fighting over the masses, why not reach out to the military community.  If you do it the right way, your bottom line will thank you.

Technorati Tags: ,

Spread the Word:  del.icio.us Digg Reddit

Marty M Fahncke - Interactive Strategist

Posted by Scott Randolph on August 15th, 2007

Marty is considered one of worlds leading experts in “Electronic Retailing”, which includes internet, television, radio, and teleseminars.  He joins SiteEDGE from FawnKey & Associates, which he owned and operated from 1999 to 2007.   FawnKey & Associates is a business and marketing consulting firm with particular emphasis in e-commerce.  In this capacity, Marty earned hundreds of millions of dollars for his clients.  Marty also has experience in Mergers & Acquisitions, completing over $200 million in corporate acquisitions and divestitures from 2001 to 2003.  Marty shares his knowledge of Interactive marketing through his regular “Online Strategies” column in Electronic Retailer magazine, is frequently featured in marketing and business publications, and speaks to live audiences around the world about online marketing at numerous conferences and tradeshows.

Spread the Word:  del.icio.us Digg Reddit

Who’s Hurting Email Marketing’s Reputation?

Posted by Steve Thompson on August 8th, 2007

A must read article on e-mail marketing  

I won’t spend time saying what Loren has already said.  Let’s just say that this article describes very well the difference between the good guys and the bad guys.

http://blogs.mediapost.com/email_insider/?p=482

Technorati Tags: ,

Spread the Word:  del.icio.us Digg Reddit